Forum de FilmDeCulte

So why didn't we get that ending, with Kevin overlooking the school? In a taped introduction to this VERY short shot of Kevin, the alternate ending, M. Night Shyamalan explains why he cut it, saying:

"It was the original ending of The Hoard in the script, and then I wrote the one that's in the movie, at the mirror, and we reshot that afterwards. And that felt more like the vibe of how I wanted [the movie] to end. So I had this ending in for a while, and I kind of moved it around in a few different places. It was just too dark. It kind of made it feel one-note for me, about what his intentions were. What is his motivation? I just didn't want The Beast's motivations to be reduced to just kind of killing. That kind of thing. So that's why I wrote the ending that you see in the movie, at the mirror. That was more, kind of, showing the world what we are capable of."

M. Night Shyamalan also explains that he had a hard time figuring out where this alternate ending scene of Kevin glaring at the school would even fit, if it would go before the diner tag with Bruce Willis, or after it. The director had to know that he would lose the audience's focus on Kevin the moment that he showed Willis in character as David once again. Because the implications of that reveal, and what it might mean for Unbreakable 3, would be all anyone would want to talk about... not Kevin (James McAvoy) looking down on a school.

J'ai mis longtemps à voir ce film à cause des critiques plus que tièdes lues ici. Franchement, je ne comprends pas. Certes, le film n'est pas au niveau d'incassable mais après m' être tapé plein de Marvel quelconques, je ne vois pas comment on peut faire la fine bouche sur ce film et s'éclater sur les autres films de superhéros.

Déjà, Split n'est pas un film de super-héros